nanog mailing list archives
Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad?
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh () outblaze com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:19:25 +0530
Stephen J. Wilcox [2/3/2004 8:13 PM] :
Ok I just realised what I'm doing here, 550 is a permanent fail and at this point as I am holding the mail on my server I should decide to return it to the sender. This isnt actually whats filling my queue and actually the reason I have some of these with 550 codes in the queue log is because they are bounces which means we handle them differently to normal mails and dont immediately fail them.I'd mixed permanent and temporary, but thanks to rfc821 I've resolved myconfusion!
To clean out all the frozen mail ... exim -bpru|grep frozen|awk {'print $3'}|xargs exim -Mr -- srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9 manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
Current thread:
- antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Message not available
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Daniel Senie (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Joe Maimon (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? Adi Linden (Feb 03)
- Re: antivirus in smtp, good or bad? JC Dill (Feb 03)