nanog mailing list archives
RE: /24s run amuck
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett () msmgmt com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:35:05 -0500
Ok, I am often outgunned and off target here. But I have to ask this: 1. If filtering is used, as suggested by someone, what happens to the small/mid-sized company that is multi-homed out of an ISP's /20 or larger block? In this case, I can see an ISP with a /20 bust that up to /21s smaller to accommodate this user. 2. Wasn't /24 filtering something that a few large ISP's did a few years ago and everyone complained? I don't have a reference here but I seem to remember some flack about that. 3. What happens in the case of a carrier that has given /24s to a downstream out of different blocks? I guess the real question is this: If X company can not be reached, how/who would you complain to? And would this be like the RR and AOL email filtering lists where we all complain, and this filtering is an effort by some to force others to clean up their act? Am I out in Left field? Jim
Current thread:
- Re: /24s run amuck, (continued)
- Re: /24s run amuck Daniel Senie (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck John Payne (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck haesu (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steve Francis (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steve Francis (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Frank Louwers (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Simon Leinen (Jan 15)
- Re: /24s run amuck Stephen J. Wilcox (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 13)
- Re: /24s run amuck Sean M . Doran (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Patrick W . Gilmore (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Paul (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck David Barak (Jan 14)
- Re: /24s run amuck Steven M. Bellovin (Jan 14)