nanog mailing list archives

Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed publicly available?]


From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2004 00:39:05 -0400



Kind of summarizes why we are still heavy on the "best effort" side of the
equation. 

-M




Regards,

--
Martin Hannigan                         (c) 617-388-2663
VeriSign, Inc.                          (w) 703-948-7018
                                         http://www.verisign.com/



-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog () merit edu <owner-nanog () merit edu>
To: Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>
CC: nanog () merit edu <nanog () merit edu>
Sent: Mon Jul 05 21:32:14 2004
Subject: Re: concern over public peering points [WAS: Peering point speed
publicly available?]


On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 01:43:14AM +0000, Paul Vixie wrote:

vgill () vijaygill com (vijay gill) writes:
Throwing ethernet cables over the ceiling does not scale.

i think it's important to distinguish between "things aol and uunet don't
think are good for aol and uunet" and "things that aren't good for
anybody."

what i found through my PAIX experience is that the second tier is really
quite deep and broad, and that the first tier doesn't ignore them like
their
spokesmodels claim they do.

Paul, I think you took a left at the pass and went down the wrong road
here.   I am not saying ethernet doesn't scale or even vni/pni doesn't
scale, but the mentality embodied in the approach "throw it over the
wall" doesn't bode well if you are to scale.

not agree is free to behave that way.  but it's not useful to try to
dissuade
cooperating adults from peering any way they want to.

i've been told that if i ran a tier-1 i would lose my love for the vni/pni
approach, which i think scales quite nicely even when it involves an
ethernet
cable through the occasional ceiling.  perhaps i'll eat these words when
and
if that promotion comes through.  meanwhile, disintermediation is still my
favorite word in the internet dictionary.  i like it when one's
competitors

As we have seen before in previous lives, and I'm pretty sure stephen
stuart will step in, normalizing "throw the ethernet over the wall"
school of design just leads to an incredible amount of pain when trying
to operate, run and actually document what you've got.

I thought it was illustrative to take a look at some of the other
messages in this thread. People rushing in to argue the scale comment
when the actual heart of the matter was something else entirely,
which apparently only Tony managed to get.

In any case, I am going to pull a randy here and strongly encourage my
competitors to deploy this "ethernet over ceiling tile" engineering
methodology.

/vijay


Current thread: