nanog mailing list archives
Re: Campus size Wireless LAN
From: Brandon Pinsky <bjp () columbia edu>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 16:03:18 -0400
I just installed a Quickbridge 60 recently. It's pretty nice. The throughput is good over a .75 mile link. I was able to successfully push ~20Mbps with an iperf test. Installation was easy relative to some of the other equipment we have installed. The feed line is UTP and the radio gets power over the UTP cable. The uplink interface is 100BaseT which is easy. My only complaint is that it is not remotely manageable. You have to have direct console to make any config changes which means taking the link down. We have another .11a system in production made by RadioLan and it is plagued by the same design flaw. Stupid... I'd like to compare it to the Cisco one. I bet it is more manageable.
BJ On Jul 21, 2004, at 2:01 PM, Eric Brown wrote:
Anyone have experience with Proxim's tsunami quickbridge for wireless connectivity between buildings at line of site distances under 1 mile? It's cheaper than Cisco and looks good on paper. Looking for the good bad and ugly. Thanks in advance! -Eric
Current thread:
- Campus size Wireless LAN Eric Brown (Jul 21)
- RE: Campus size Wireless LAN Roy (Jul 21)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN D. Scott Smith (Jul 21)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN Brandon Pinsky (Jul 21)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN Scott Blomquist (Jul 21)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN Curtis Maurand (Jul 21)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN William Petrisko (Jul 21)
- RE: Campus size Wireless LAN Douglas S. Peeples (Jul 22)
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN Michael Painter (Jul 21)
- Message not available
- Re: Campus size Wireless LAN Rob Nelson (Jul 24)
- RE: Campus size Wireless LAN Roy (Jul 21)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Campus size Wireless LAN Eric Brown (Jul 21)