nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP list of phishing sites?
From: Simon Lockhart <simon.lockhart () bbc co uk>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 22:18:56 +0100
On Mon Jun 28, 2004 at 03:12:12PM -0600, Smith, Donald wrote:
So would ISP's block an phishing site if it was proven to be a phishing site and reported by their customers?
Would you block access to a kiddie porn site? Do you block access to "warez" sites? Both are illegal. I'm not convinced that phishing is illegal in its own right (except possible as "passing off"). Phishing sites only work because Banks won't invest in strong authentication, and users are stupid. Why should it become the ISPs problem to fix those inadequacies? Some banks in Europe use one-time-password token things (such as SecurID). Are those banks being caught out by phishing? Simon -- Simon Lockhart | Tel: +44 (0)1628 407720 (x(01)37720) | Si fractum Technology Manager | Fax: +44 (0)1628 407701 (x(01)37701) | non sit, noli BBC Internet Ops | Email: Simon.Lockhart () bbc co uk | id reficere BBC Technology, Maiden House, Vanwall Road, Maidenhead. SL6 4UB. UK
Current thread:
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites?, (continued)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? David Barak (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? David Barak (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 29)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Michael . Dillon (Jun 29)
- RE: BGP list of phishing sites? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Simon Lockhart (Jun 28)
- Re: BGP list of phishing sites? Paul Vixie (Jun 29)