nanog mailing list archives
RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006
From: Tony Rall <trall () almaden ibm com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 21:24:39 -0700
On Monday, 2004-06-28 at 20:41 MST, Greg Schwimer <gschwimer () godaddy com> wrote:
Some things you can look into:firewall interface(10.10.1.122/30). ip route 192.168.5.0 255.255.255.0 10.10.1.124Is that the firewall interface is 10.10.1.122, or is it 10.10.1.124? 10.10.1.122 is a host address in the 10.10.1.120/30 subnet. 10.10.1.124 is a /30 network. Either way, you're dealing with two different subnets. Oddly, it's working sometimes.
On top of that, we have this discrepancy: On Monday, 2004-06-28 at 19:01 CST, Joe Shen <jshen () spymac com> wrote:
interface FastEthernet4/41 ip address 10.10.1.213 255.255.255.252
So the router's address isn't even on the same subnet as the firewall's. Again, it's not clear how it ever worked. Tony Rall
Current thread:
- Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Joe Shen (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Erik Amundson (Jun 28)
- Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Robert Blayzor (Jun 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Greg Schwimer (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Tony Rall (Jun 28)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Scott McGrath (Jun 29)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Joe Shen (Jun 28)
- Re: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Robert Blayzor (Jun 29)
- RE: Strange behavior of Catalyst4006 Pendergrass, Greg (Jun 29)