Re: [OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)

[Paul Jakma <paul () clubi ie>]

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Randy Bush wrote:

> reply-to: headers are bad.

Oh, on that I agree.

There are draft RFCs to specify these things better, eg seperating 
the concept of 'Reply-to' into one policy for list related replies 
and another for personal, mutt supports these drafts already[1], but 
there hasnt been much apparent movement in these drafts becoming 
standards track. (primarily because there are already similar headers 
defined and RFC standards tracked for NNTP readers/posters).

1. which can be annoying when dealing with mutt users.

regards,
--
Paul Jakma      paul () clubi ie        paul () jakma org       Key ID: 64A2FF6A
        warning: do not ever send email to spam () dishone st
Fortune:
The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.