nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick () ianai net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 14:31:08 -0400
On Jun 18, 2004, at 2:25 PM, Wayne E. Bouchard wrote:
verisign's official position throughout the sitefinder launch was that "users are free to disable it if they want to." they did NOT want this characterized as them shoving their sitefinder service down anybody's unwilling throat. so i don't expect any action to occur against folks who installed a BIND patch.Um, unless I really missed something during this whole episode, that was the only way TO disable it.
Have the roots recurse and put a wildcard in for anything that does not resolve.
Makes Paul a ... well, not a competitor, 'cause that would imply they were in competition. If the roots put in the wild card, the GTLDs cannot compete.
-- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Edward B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Owen DeLong (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 20)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Wayne E. Bouchard (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Patrick W Gilmore (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jon R. Kibler (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Henry Linneweh (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Steven M. Bellovin (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN David Lesher (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)