nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Peter H Salus <peter () netpedant com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 13:18:36 -0700
I will admit to only thinking about this for a few days. However, it seems to me that the Harvard material is rather narrowly focussed both on a temporal and on a topical level. I am an admirer of Froomkin's essays, and have published at least one of them (in the distant past when Matrix News was published). I haven't really looked at Ruling the Root, because I was turned off by Dave Crocker's review in IPJ. But, anyway, as it appeared in 2002, I imagine it contains little of the recent Verisign/Netsol "business." However, I should most likely give Mueller more leeway, as I really liked his telephony book. Peter
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN, (continued)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Neiberger (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Curran (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Vincent J. Bono (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN John Curran (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Peter H Salus (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jonathan Slivko (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Paul Vixie (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Jonathan Slivko (Jun 18)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Peter H Salus (Jun 19)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dickson, Brian (Jun 21)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Alexei Roudnev (Jun 21)