nanog mailing list archives
Re: UPnP
From: Henry Linneweh <hrlinneweh () sbcglobal net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2004 01:50:31 -0800 (PST)
That reads more like a person who is customer centric with an acceptable idea... -Henry Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote: On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, James Edwards wrote:
I see a lot of unicast UPnP traffic on my networks. UPnP seems like a train wreck waiting to happen, to me.
Yep. Giving insecure PC's the power to change firewall settings. Doesn't sound like the cleverest idea. I have a firewall, my computer can't be a zombie. Yes, I click on every attachment I see and install every program any random web site offers me, but I have a firewall so my computer can't be a zombie :-( But it does demostrate that people really, really want to run their applications no matter how we try to stop them. Instead of blocking people from running their applications, can we figure out better ways for them to run them safely?
Current thread:
- FW: hey had eric sent you Riley, Marty (Mar 12)
- Re: FW: hey had eric sent you James Edwards (Mar 12)
- UPnP Sean Donelan (Mar 12)
- Re: UPnP Henry Linneweh (Mar 13)
- UPnP Sean Donelan (Mar 12)
- Re: hey had eric sent you joe (Mar 12)
- Re: hey had eric sent you Scott McGrath (Mar 15)
- Re: FW: hey had eric sent you James Edwards (Mar 12)