nanog mailing list archives
Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG
From: "Tom (UnitedLayer)" <tom () unitedlayer com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 18:20:41 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 jlewis () lewis org wrote:
Hmm, if someone (except masochists and security vendiors) still hosts efnet... I can only send them my condoleences. I saw sthe same dialogs 6 years ago. Nothing changes.What about undernet?
Thats even worse :)
A customer wants us to help him setup an undernet IRC server. My gut feeling is, hosting IRC servers (especially on the well known networks) is like wearing a "kick me/flood me" sign on your network, and it's probably not going to be worth the pain & pages.
Sounds about right. Unless you feel like charging someone several thousands of dollars per month to host an EFNet server, don't do it unless you have a personal interest.
Current thread:
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG, (continued)
- Re: Fw: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG albertpublic (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG jqtaxpayer (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Michael . Dillon (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG sthaug (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Alexei Roudnev (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG sthaug (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG jlewis (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG william(at)elan.net (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Tom (UnitedLayer) (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 16)
- Re: Packet Kiddies Invade NANOG David Barak (Mar 16)