nanog mailing list archives
Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall
From: Raymond Dijkxhoorn <raymond () prolocation net>
Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 23:19:16 +0200 (CEST)
Hi!
Not to thread jack or anything, but when I first moved our cluster to Spam Assassin, I was disappointed at the amount of messages that would get past Spam Assassin at even a low threshold of 2. I Googled around and found a bunch of rulesets that once installed, started tagging those hard to get messages. http://www.rulesemporium.com/ is a good place to start if anybody else is running Spam Assassin straight out of the box.
And if i may plug SURBL if you wanna do that, might help with performance also. For example if you run BigEvil you might gain a lot of performance by doing that via SURBL. http://www.surbl.org Bye, Raymond.
Current thread:
- Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Claydon, Tom (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Joe Boyce (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Mike Tancsa (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Raymond Dijkxhoorn (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Petri Helenius (May 18)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Steven Champeon (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Dan Hollis (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Eric A. Hall (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall James Couzens (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Bruce Pinsky (May 19)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Joe Boyce (May 17)
- Re: Barracuda Networks Spam Firewall Matthew Crocker (May 17)