nanog mailing list archives
RE: FW: Worms versus Bots
From: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>
Date: Tue, 4 May 2004 10:54:55 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 4 May 2004, Smith, Donald wrote:
If you follow these steps outlined by SANS you should be able to successfully update and NOT get infected. This is short, easy, fully documented (with pictures :) http://www.sans.org/rr/papers/index.php?id=1298
The risk is smaller, but still exists if you follow these directions for XP pre-SP2. See the Microsoft release notes for XP SP2 for details about the fix. If you do not have XP SP2, you need to disconnect your computer from the network prior to every boot cycle until it is fully patched.
Current thread:
- Re: Worms versus Bots, (continued)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Petri Helenius (May 06)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Chris Woodfield (May 11)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Valdis . Kletnieks (May 11)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Chris Woodfield (May 11)
- RE: Worms versus Bots Jonathan M. Slivko (May 11)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Chris Woodfield (May 11)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Paul Jakma (May 13)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Rick Ernst (May 11)
- RE: FW: Worms versus Bots Sean Donelan (May 04)
- RE: FW: Worms versus Bots Daniel Senie (May 04)
- RE: FW: Worms versus Bots Michael . Dillon (May 05)
- RE: FW: Worms versus Bots william(at)elan.net (May 05)
- Re: Worms versus Bots Matthew Crocker (May 05)
- Re: FW: Worms versus Bots Robert E. Seastrom (May 05)
- Re: FW: Worms versus Bots Alexei Roudnev (May 06)
- Re: FW: Worms versus Bots Chris Adams (May 07)
- Re: FW: Worms versus Bots Jeff Shultz (May 07)
- Re: FW: Worms versus Bots Alexei Roudnev (May 07)