nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cisco HFR
From: Deepak Jain <deepak () ai net>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 15:32:56 -0400
I thought the main reason for "in service upgrades" was to allow daily updates to the code instead of the now popular bi-weekly ones. :-)I've heard the rumor that that would be the first port that they would undertake, and that would make some sense. However, I hope that they focus their efforts on stabilizing first and porting second. No point in porting what isn't stable.
Oh my god. I am picturing CSR-1 "Auto Update" (ala Windows Update). I think I haven't been this scared in a month. Deepak
Current thread:
- Re: Cisco HFR, (continued)
- Re: Cisco HFR Adrian Chadd (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Alexei Roudnev (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Robert E. Seastrom (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kurt Erik Lindqvist (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Tony Li (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Deepak Jain (May 27)
- RE: Cisco HFR Neil J. McRae (May 27)
- Re: Cisco HFR Kevin Oberman (May 25)
- Re: Cisco HFR Mans Nilsson (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Petri Helenius (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Warren Kumari (May 26)
- Re: Cisco HFR Eric Kuhnke (May 25)