nanog mailing list archives
RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested
From: "Ray Plzak" <plzak () arin net>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 07:00:32 -0500
This thread was started by Leo Bicknell on Mon Nov 08 14:28:16 2004. The original post stated: "The IETF IPv6 working group is considering two proposals right now for IPv6 "private networks". Think RFC-1918 type space, but redefined for the IPv6 world. Those two drafts can be found at: "http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-unique-local-addr-07.tx t http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-ipv6-ula-central-00.txt" <snip> "Since this is a list of providers, I encourage you to read the drafts, and submit your comments to the working group. The information for the working group is at http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/ipv6-charter.html, and includes their mailing list archives and information on how to subscribe and/or post." "Even if you disagree with me, much like voting the important thing is that you voice your opinion." As Leo said, these two drafts are under consideration by the IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6). Mail list information is: General Discussion: ipv6 () ietf org To Subscribe: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 In Body: subscribe Archive: http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/index.html Looking at the archives for the working group there has been no recent discussion of these drafts. In the past two days there have been over 80 posts to this thread. This is a valuable discussion but to a large extent the efforts can be considered as a non input into the working group as the discussion is not on their mail list. The IETF works best when people directly contribute to the discussion and consensus building process. I encourage you to move this discussion to the working group mail list and if you are at the IETF to attend the IPv6 Working Group at 9 AM, Thursday morning in the Georgetown room. The session is also multicast. Ray
Current thread:
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested, (continued)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jeroen Massar (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Network.Security (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adam Rothschild (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jørgen Hovland (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul G (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul Vixie (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul G (Nov 09)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Ray Plzak (Nov 10)
- RE: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Tony Hain (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Adam Rothschild (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jørgen Hovland (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Paul G (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Jørgen Hovland (Nov 09)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Joe Maimon (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Randy Bush (Nov 10)
- Re: Important IPv6 Policy Issue -- Your Input Requested Christopher L. Morrow (Nov 10)