nanog mailing list archives

Re: Status of FCAPS model? Useful? Obsolete?


From: jm <thinkerteams () runbox com>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:02:44 -0500


I agree that there's alot of interest in ITIL but I'm not so sure it offers a conceptual model that makes sense of network management. ITIL is more generic that FCAPS so it would be like describing scientific method in terms of Aristotle's concepts of form and matter. Bad analogy?

The usefulness that I see in the model is it's ability to present a big picture of the functional areas that must be addressed if an enterprise or sp is to manage a network well. It's a communication device. When you explain to someone who has never heard of it that well run networks have teams that manage network faults, network configuration, network accounting, performance and security....they tend to go, "oh yeah. I see." The question I am asking is whether or not there are key activities that are outside FCAPS but nonetheless essential these days to running a network....with the overarching awareness that there are some activities that are so generic that they don't warrant being specifically part of the mission of network managers
....


At 02:59 PM 11/10/2004, Irwin Lazar wrote:

We see a lot of interest among enterprises in ITIL for IT service
management, which I'm guessing would overlap the FCAPS framework.  Is anyone
investing it for the SP side?

(what's ITIL?  - http://www.ogc.gov.uk/index.asp?id=2261)

Irwin


> From: Christian Kuhtz <christian.kuhtz () BELLSOUTH COM>
> Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:23:31 -0500
> To: Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com>, "Hannigan, Martin"
> <hannigan () verisign com>
> Cc: <nanog () merit edu>
> Subject: Re: Status of FCAPS model? Useful? Obsolete?
>
>
>
> Seems the latest cluster of hype is around (e)TOM from the TMF, much more
> than strict FCAPS etc.
>
>
> On 11/9/04 1:13 AM, "Sean Donelan" <sean () donelan com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Mon, 8 Nov 2004, Hannigan, Martin wrote:
>>>> Does the FCAPS model still hold currency among network
>>>> managers/engineers
>>>> today?
>>>
>>> What's FCAPS?
>>
>> I suppose that answers the question whether FCAPS holds currency
>> among network managers/engineers.
>>
>>
>> It is an ITU-T developed network management model composed of
>> Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security (FCAPS).
>>
>> Some people think it is a mandatory specification for how to
>> manage a network; other people think it is an antiquated view
>> of telecom network management; and yet other people think it is
>> as relevant as the ISO 7-layer network model.
>>
>
>
> The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which > it is addressed and may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged > material. Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking > of any action in reliance upon this information by persons or entities other
> than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you received this in error,
> please contact the sender and delete the material from all computers. 163
>
>


Current thread: