Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?

[Paul Vixie <vixie () vix com>]

iljitsch () muada com (Iljitsch van Beijnum) writes:

> Wow, IPv6 misinformation is reaching unprecendented heights here on 
> NANOG...

yes.  for example, you wrote...

> There is currently no PI in IPv6 unless you're an internet exchange or 
> a root server.

...but i really do think of 2001:4f8::/32 as PI, even though ISC is neither
an IX nor a rootserver.  (f-root has its own /48, which is something else.)
-- 
Paul Vixie