nanog mailing list archives

Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?


From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 12:46:45 +0100


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 2004-11-16, at 08.28, Jeroen Massar wrote:
I have seen IPv6 prefixes, that were allocated and then returned, being
allocated to another organization with somewhat a period of 6 months in
between.

Good!

Thus one can assume that ASN will be re-used too. Of course I
think that the few couple of prefixes I happen to have seen this
happening with where 'given back' from the originally owning
organization and not reclaimed from them. Meaning that the RIR knew 
that
it was not in use anymore. Fortunately there are of course systems like
RIS (http://ris.ripe.net) to figure this out. Then again, allocations,
be they ASN's, IPv6 or IPv4 prefixes, are not only allocated for the
public internet usage, but solely to be globally unique.

I am less interested in how these resources where reclaimed. I think 
that shouldn't matter. I think it's better that we start reclaiming and 
reusing to gain some experience. Again, that will be so much easier to 
do sooner than later...

- - kurtis -

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.1

iQA/AwUBQZnoqqarNKXTPFCVEQJ9fgCgivxjgO4casQ1yELuOB8xfN0dPXIAn1u9
Wjre0YUoiZDvE1GNLuTzSPgM
=Ccg6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Current thread: