nanog mailing list archives
Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?]
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels () cistron nl>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 17:29:50 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cistron.1100797360.3557.15.camel () firenze zurich ibm com>, Jeroen Massar <jeroen () unfix org> wrote:
On Thu, 2004-11-18 at 16:40 +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:That depends on the jurisdiction. In many parts of the world, downloading is NOT illegal. But making copyrighted files available for download is illegal (without the proper autorization, ofcourse).Thus... say a newsserver full of illegal stuff is quite illegal? Or that other nice example 'proxy servers', they store the data and then relay it. A router could be said to 'store' the data also (in registers for like a zillionth microsecond ;) and
In general, store-and-forward and caching are allowed and not illegal. Yet. Mike.
Current thread:
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?], (continued)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Michael . Dillon (Nov 22)
- Message not available
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 22)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Elmar K. Bins (Nov 23)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 30)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Alex Bligh (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Eric A. Hall (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 20)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Barney Wolff (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Owen DeLong (Nov 29)
- Re: who gets a /32 [Re: IPV6 renumbering painless?] Paul Vixie (Nov 29)