nanog mailing list archives
Re: Stupid Ipv6 question...
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () gitoyen net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 09:15:46 +0100
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 03:06:43AM -0500, Dan Mahoney, System Admin <danm () prime gushi org> wrote a message of 25 lines which said:
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around ipv6 style suffixes -- does anyone have a chart handy? How big is a /64, specifically?
Since an IPv6 address is 128 bits, a /64 holds 2 ** (128 - 64) addresses, which is 2 ** 64. But it seems too simple. This was really your question?
Current thread:
- Stupid Ipv6 question... Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Lars Erik Gullerud (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Leo Bicknell (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Kevin Loch (Nov 19)
- RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Scott Morris (Nov 19)
- Re: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Dan Mahoney, System Admin (Nov 19)
- RE: [nanog] RE: Stupid Ipv6 question... Scott Morris (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Lars Erik Gullerud (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Stephane Bortzmeyer (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... James (Nov 19)
- Re: Stupid Ipv6 question... Crist Clark (Nov 19)