nanog mailing list archives
Re: Diffserv service classes
From: Petri Helenius <pete () he iki fi>
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 11:56:54 +0200
Sean Donelan wrote:
Hardly, the greatest demand so far has been for "cheap if not free" packets which your transit provider can drop if he so decides. Bandwidth that is used for redundancy planning, etc.On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Vicky wrote:interesting read at: http://qbone.internet2.edu/papers/non-architectural-problems.txtThere is a long history of problems. But Internet2 also shows a success for Diffserv, namely there is demand for a "worse" effort. Are a dozen differnt classes useful to a network operator?
Queuing/diffserv is useful on thin (sub 2Mbps) edge links. Pete
Current thread:
- Diffserv service classes Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Vicky (Nov 20)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Sean Donelan (Nov 20)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Petri Helenius (Nov 21)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Marshall Eubanks (Nov 21)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Sean Donelan (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Diffserv service classes Joe St Sauver (Nov 21)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Marshall Eubanks (Nov 21)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Joe St Sauver (Nov 21)
- Re: Diffserv service classes Vicky (Nov 20)