nanog mailing list archives
Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI
From: Owen DeLong <owen () delong com>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 09:59:30 -0800
All I hear is how this company or that enterprise "should qualify" for PI space. What I don't hear is what's going to happen when the routing tables grow too large, or how to prevent this. I think just about anyone "should qualify", but ONLY if there is some form of aggregation possible. PI in IPv6 without aggregation would be a bigger mistake than all other IPv6 mistakes so far.
And v6 without PI for will not get widespread adoption. Further, ULA will become de facto PI without aggregation. Hence my believe that ULA is a bad idea, and, my recommendation that we face the reality that PI is an important thing (unless we want to replicate the v4 NAT mess). As such, I'd much rather see us develop sane PI policy than continue down the present road. Owen -- If it wasn't crypto-signed, it probably didn't come from me.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32), (continued)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 25)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Owen DeLong (Nov 26)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Fred Baker (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Sean Donelan (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Pekka Savola (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI prefix [Re: who gets a /32) Scott W Brim (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Paul Vixie (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Owen DeLong (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Paul Vixie (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI bmanning (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Iljitsch van Beijnum (Nov 29)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI bmanning (Nov 27)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Leo Bicknell (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Paul Vixie (Nov 28)
- Re: BBC does IPv6 ;) (Was: large multi-site enterprises and PI Daniel Roesen (Nov 28)