nanog mailing list archives

RE: ULA and RIR cost-recovery


From: Måns Nilsson <mansaxel () sunet se>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2004 14:42:55 +0100



--On onsdag 24 november 2004 11.40 -0800 Tony Hain <alh-ietf () tndh net>
wrote:


The current problem is that the RIR membership has self-selected to a
state where they set policies that ensure the end customer has no
alternative except to be locked into their provider's address space.

Do note that, IIRC, RIPE had this up for discussion some time ago and opted
in-session for an "one AS -- one global prefix" solution which was then
overridden because APNIC and ARIN weren't as impressed by that solution. 

Don't blame Europe ;-) 
-- 
Måns Nilsson         Systems Specialist
+46 70 681 7204         KTHNOC
                        MN1334-RIPE

Attachment: _bin
Description:


Current thread: