nanog mailing list archives
Re: Blackhole Routes
From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Sun, 03 Oct 2004 10:19:33 -0400
Ian Dickinson <ian.dickinson () pipex net> writes:
My point is that no-export or no-advertise doesn't play well with multiple ASNs under common admin control.
If this is your situation, perhaps already you have propagation suppression communities that cause the Right Thing to happen at the outer edge of your pile-o-ASes. I've certainly done that when in a similar situation. Send that community along with the blackhole community and you're done. You're correct that the well-known communities don't scale to multiple ASes.
Don't simplify the protocol unnecessarily based on your specific assumptions on how others may or may not use a feature.
Trying to morph the protocol into something that is arbitrarily complex and custom-tailored to your particular situation is no better in terms of assumptions of how others may or may not use a feature. Provide basic building blocks and let people build out of them what they may.
Blackholing schemes need to be simple enough to employ in a hurry at 4am whilst still achieving the desired effect.
And Richard's suggestion is just that. ---Rob
Current thread:
- Re: Blackhole Routes Randy Bush (Sep 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Blackhole Routes Bill Stewart (Oct 01)
- RE: Blackhole Routes Matt Ryan (Oct 01)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 02)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Robert E . Seastrom (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Ian Dickinson (Oct 03)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Richard A Steenbergen (Oct 02)
- RE: Blackhole Routes Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Oct 04)
- Re: Blackhole Routes Petri Helenius (Oct 04)
- RE: Blackhole Routes Wayne Gustavus (nanog) (Oct 05)