nanog mailing list archives
Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178
From: Roland Perry <lists () internetpolicyagency com>
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2004 09:37:51 +0100
In article <41393B29.6010804 () centergate com>, Rodney Joffe <rjoffe () centergate com> writes
For those who care, based on responses and some analysis, it appears that very few networks do follow the ripe-229 recommendations regarding "golden networks", including, oddly enough, parts of RIPE itself.
Did you mean "parts of RIPE-NCC"?Sorry to be so pedantic, but this thread started off with a mild diversion caused by confusion between RIPE and RIPE-NCC.
-- Roland Perry
Current thread:
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178, (continued)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Petri Helenius (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 David Barak (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Robert E . Seastrom (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Rodney Joffe (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Randy Bush (Sep 02)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Rodney Joffe (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Stephen J. Wilcox (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Steve Gibbard (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Rodney Joffe (Sep 03)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Roland Perry (Sep 04)
- Re: RIPE "Golden Networks" Document ID - 229/210/178 Rodney Joffe (Sep 04)