nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verisign vs. ICANN
From: Dan Hollis <goemon () anime net>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 16:01:46 -0700 (PDT)
On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Matthew Sullivan wrote:
Dan Hollis wrote:On Mon, 16 Aug 2004, Andre Oppermann wrote:PS: I will patent it myself to prevent Versign from doing this.Wouldnt it be beautiful if a bunch of people patented the hell out of various ways to exploit dns wildcarding, thus preventing verisign from doing anything useful with it at all...It would only be useful if those people were also in a position to vigorously defend said patents when (and if) they were infringed. / Mat
If the patent is strong enough, wouldnt some patent attorney be willing to defend it on a contingency basis? With the potential $$ in a patent violation judgement against verisign, I would think attorneys would be all over it. -Dan
Current thread:
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Matthew Sullivan (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 09)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Dan Hollis (Sep 10)
- Re: Verisign vs. ICANN Joe Rhett (Sep 10)