nanog mailing list archives
Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing
From: "Bryce Enevoldson" <benevold () southern edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2004 17:43:38 -0400
We are in the process of updating our internet connection to 8 t1's bound together. Due to price, our options have been narrowed to AT&T and MCI. I have two questions: 1. Which technology is better for binding t1's: multi link frame relay (mci's) or load balancing (att's) 2. Which company has a better pop in Atlanta: mci or att? We are in the Chattanooga TN area and our current connection is 6 t1's through att but they will only bond 4 so they are split 4 and 2. Bryce Enevoldson Information Processing Southern Adventist University
Current thread:
- Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Bryce Enevoldson (Sep 16)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Daniel Senie (Sep 16)
- Message not available
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Christopher L. Morrow (Sep 16)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Jay Hennigan (Sep 16)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing james edwards (Sep 16)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Edward B. Dreger (Sep 18)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Scott McGrath (Sep 16)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Jeff Kell (Sep 16)
- RE: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Rump Bryant (Sep 17)
- Re: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Jeff Kell (Sep 16)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing Cody Lerum (Sep 16)
- RE: Multi-link Frame Relay OR Load Balancing kwallace (Sep 16)