nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX Outages
From: Alexander Koch <koch () tiscali net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2005 14:08:13 +0200
On Fri, 29 April 2005 13:04:05 +0100, Neil J. McRae wrote:
and we happily overloaded our peers' interfaces at the respective other IX...That sounds more like a planning issue than anything else. If you have traffic going through a pipe, then you need to make sure you have somewhere else to send it. If you are managing your peers properly, private or public, there should be no issue.
With public peering you simply never know how much spare capacity your peer has free. And would you expect your peer with 400 Mbit/s total to have 400 reserved on his AMSIX port for you when you see 300 at LINX and LINX goes down? Been there, numerous times. I still tend to say - it depends on your type of peers and traffic per peer. Alexander
Current thread:
- PAIX Outages Jay Patel (Apr 27)
- Re: PAIX Outages Randy Bush (Apr 27)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 28)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Daniel Roesen (Apr 29)
- RE: PAIX Outages Neil J. McRae (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Stephen J. Wilcox (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Leo Bicknell (Apr 28)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: PAIX Outages Huopio Kauto (Apr 28)
- Re: PAIX Outages Brandon Butterworth (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Alexander Koch (Apr 29)
- Re: PAIX Outages Brandon Butterworth (Apr 29)