nanog mailing list archives
Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND
From: Niek <niek () asbak coding-slaves com>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2005 02:43:14 +0200
On 4/9/2005 1:50 AM +0100, Paul Vixie wrote:
Count Server Software
[snip some list] One could also put together a list based on: - Security holes. - Amount of code - Bloatness - Seperation of functionality - # of seconds it takes to load huge amounts of zones In the end, it all comes down to religion: Bind people don't ack djb points and vice versa. Niek Baakman --
Current thread:
- djbdns: An alternative to BIND Vicky Rode (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND John Kinsella (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niek (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Dragos Ruiu (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Niels Bakker (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Will Yardley (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND David Conrad (Apr 09)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Paul Vixie (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 08)
- Re: djbdns: An alternative to BIND Nathan Ward (Apr 08)