nanog mailing list archives
Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network?
From: "Andrew - Supernews" <andrew () supernews net>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 21:06:04 +0100
"Philip" == Philip Matthews <matthews () nimcatnetworks com> writes:
Philip> A number of IETF documents(*) state that there are some Philip> service providers that place a NAT box in front of their Philip> entire network, so all their customers get private addresses Philip> rather than public address. It is often stated that these Philip> are primarily cable-based providers. Philip> I am trying to get a handle on how common this practice is. Philip> No one that I have asked seems to know any provider that does Philip> this, fastweb.it in Italy, and the Direcway satellite system in the US are the most obvious examples that I know of. I'm sure there are more. -- Andrew, Supernews http://www.supernews.com
Current thread:
- Service providers that NAT their whole network? Philip Matthews (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jon Lewis (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Andrew - Supernews (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? sjk (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Steve Meuse (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Bill Woodcock (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Scott Call (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 15)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Jeff Kell (Apr 15)
- Message not available
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Chris Woodfield (Apr 22)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? John Payne (Apr 22)
- Re: Service providers that NAT their whole network? Owen DeLong (Apr 19)