nanog mailing list archives
Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast...
From: Bill Stewart <nonobvious () gmail com>
Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 01:22:58 -0700
.... PPPoEoL2TPoIPSECoLANEoIPV6oRFC1149.....
What a bunch of mean nasty ugly stuff. My Sonic.net connection is simply rfc1483 (IP packets on an ATM PVC with a standard SNAP header), and I think that's probably what SBC is delivering them. AT&T's business SDSL and IDSL circuits also work that way, and I think our business ADSL does too (definitely over Covad, but there may be some locations we can't get that); I don't know what the AT&T Consumer folks do, but it's nice to have a design that Just Works, and that leaves the IP issues to the ISP and doesn't have the ILEC/CLEC messing with MTU sizes for no good reason. Bill
Current thread:
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast..., (continued)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Andy Johnson (Apr 18)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 18)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... just me (Apr 18)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Steve Sobol (Apr 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jay R. Ashworth (Apr 19)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Andy Johnson (Apr 18)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Chris Woodfield (Apr 23)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Alex Rubenstein (Apr 19)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Jason Slagle (Apr 19)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Matt Taber (Apr 19)
- Re: Verizon Offering Naked DSL in Northeast... Bill Stewart (Apr 24)