nanog mailing list archives
Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash
From: Matt Ghali <matt () snark net>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 10:53:28 -0700 (PDT)
Our ISPs don't block anything, to my knowledge; but when our users' ISPs began blocking port 25 (especially SBC DSL) we had already been encouraging users to configure their clients to use 587. matto On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Paul Ryan wrote: For any educational institutions on this list - what has been the impact on your mail services once your ISP started blocking port 25 - what if any was the backlash - and how difficult was it to provide alternatives ...587,465 etc ... --matt () snark net------------------------------------------<darwin>< The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. - Edmund Burke
Current thread:
- FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Paul Ryan (Apr 26)
- Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Matt Ghali (Apr 26)
- Re: FW: Port 25 - Blacklash Eric Gauthier (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Adam Jacob Muller (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Hank Nussbacher (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Daniel Golding (Apr 26)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Alexei Roudnev (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joel Jaeggli (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Suresh Ramasubramanian (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Joe Maimon (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Valdis . Kletnieks (Apr 27)
- Re: Port 25 - Blacklash Adam Jacob Muller (Apr 26)