nanog mailing list archives
Re: using TCP53 for DNS
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer () nic fr>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 09:24:34 +0200
On Tue, Apr 26, 2005 at 07:01:47PM +0000, Christopher L. Morrow <christopher.morrow () mci com> wrote a message of 29 lines which said:
Even after I imagine that folks left the filters in place either 'because' or 'I don't run router acls' or 'laziness'....
[Warning, operational content.] Remember that most "firewalls" or other "middleboxes" on the Internet are completely unmanaged. They were configured once and for all. (See the problems with former bogons or with 192.0.0.0/8.) The architecture of the Internet was designed for a network where all the routers were heavily managed and by knowledgeable people. Now, the switch to a network of mostly unmanaged boxes is a big challenge.
Current thread:
- using TCP53 for DNS Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Christopher L. Morrow (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Patrick W. Gilmore (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Florian Weimer (Apr 26)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Stephane Bortzmeyer (Apr 27)
- Re: using TCP53 for DNS Nils Ketelsen (Apr 28)