nanog mailing list archives
Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter
From: Jon Lewis <jlewis () lewis org>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2005 20:14:00 -0400 (EDT)
On Wed, 3 Aug 2005, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
On 03/08/05, mkawano () bb softbank co jp <mkawano () bb softbank co jp> wrote:Softbank BB (AS17676) was allocated 126/8 from APNIC, and Softbank BB (AS17676) immediately tried to use 126/8.Jon, could you tell Kawano san just how many sites are still blocking 69/8? :)
Number of IP's currently known to have 69/8 filter issues: 299 Number of /24 networks's currently known to have 69/8 filter issues: 261And it's probably actually not that bad anymore. It seems a bunch of the IPs that were reachable from our old ARIN space but not 69/8 aren't reachable at all anymore. Back in late 2002 and early 2003 (when we got ours), 69/8 was much worse.
Looking through the archives, it seems that first number was initially about 1000 when we got our 69 space, and when I announced http://69box.atlantic.net/ we had:
Number of IP's currently known to have 69/8 filter issues: 683 Number of /24 networks's currently known to have 69/8 filter issues: 511So the half life of outdated bogon filters appears to be about 2.5 years, but if you really bug people like I did initially, you can make much better progress. I basically picked the largest, most important looking networks and contacted them manually via email and phone.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jon Lewis | I route Senior Network Engineer | therefore you areAtlantic Net | _________ http://www.lewis.org/~jlewis/pgp for PGP public key_________
Current thread:
- Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter mkawano (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Jon Lewis (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Joel Jaeggli (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Mikael Abrahamsson (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Christopher L. Morrow (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter mkawano (Aug 03)
- RE: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Valdis . Kletnieks (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Marlon Borba (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Roy Badami (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Joe Abley (Aug 03)
- RE: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Randy Bush (Aug 03)
- Re: Traffic to our customer's address(126.0.0.0/8) seems blocked by packet filter Suresh Ramasubramanian (Aug 03)