nanog mailing list archives
Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think
From: Scott Francis <darkuncle () gmail com>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:03:11 -0500
On 8/3/05, Robert E. Seastrom <rs () seastrom com> wrote:
Michael.Dillon () btradianz com writes:We should all be looking to the security auditing work done by the OpenBSD team for an example of how systems can be cleaned up, fixed, and locked down if there is a will to do so.Beer, unsupported assertions, and lack of rigorous audit methodology can be blended together to make one's code more secure?
what unsupported assertions? The project's record speaks for itself. Don't confuse Theo's lack of social graces with a lack of polish on the project he leads (a common mistake). -- darkuncle@{gmail.com,darkuncle.net} || 0x5537F527 encrypted email to the latter address please http://darkuncle.net/pubkey.asc for public key
Current thread:
- Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael . Dillon (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael . Dillon (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Scott Francis (Aug 04)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Joel Jaeggli (Aug 05)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Michael Loftis (Aug 03)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert Bonomi (Aug 03)
- Re: Your router/switch may be less secure than you think Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 03)