nanog mailing list archives

Re: /8 end user assignment?


From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 16:34:11 +0000 (GMT)



On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Daniel Golding wrote:

On 8/7/05 4:54 PM, "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow () mci com>
wrote:


On Sun, 7 Aug 2005, William Warren wrote:


I think i did not make myself clear.  The corrections off-list are
valid..:)  However the modems are accessed by the providers using
RFC1918 space and not public IP space.  This is true it does not mean

and there was a mention at IETF by Alian of comcast (formerly of FT I
thought?) that comcast was looking at an immediate ipv6 rollout: "because
net 10 is not big enough"... 'immediate' on some scale not 'ten years out'
(no timeframes mentioned, sorry)

I suspect Comcast's mouth is bigger than its stomach, as it were. They have
a few other things they may want to tackle before rolling out v6. I don't
see a Comcact v6 rollout positively impacting their reliability.

oh, you mean like how are they going to manage that device which is
imbedded and doesn't know from v6 today? :) yea, I was just repeating a
quote from the conference, nothing more. Funny though it was.


Current thread: