nanog mailing list archives

Re: Cisco crapaganda


From: Robert E.Seastrom <rs () seastrom com>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 12:25:19 -0400



Michael.Dillon () btradianz com writes:

If not, once again, I'd ask you to cite sources rather 
than make broad sweeping statements about what is already available. 
Appealing to some anonymous authority in order to claim the sky is 
falling is hardly endearing.

I think that people who specialise in security know what
I am referring to. I won't say any more publicly since
there are black hats reading this list. If they don't already
know about this stuff, I'm not going to help them.

Get a grip, Michael.  Any black hat who reads this list already knows
this information (if indeed it exists; acting mysterious isn't gaining
you any credibility with the cynical among us, and of course you
aren't even providing enough detail for people with clues to discern
what the bloody heck you're referring to).  All you're doing is
withholding data from the non-black-hats.

                                        ---rob


Current thread: