nanog mailing list archives
Re: DSL Network Design Question
From: abuse () cabal org uk ()
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:52:57 +0000 (UTC)
Roy Badami <roy () gnomon org uk> wrote: [...]
Interesting, thanks. TBH, I really don't understand why Cisco have kept the classful support for this long...
When a friend was doing a CCNA back in 2003-ish, Cisco were still teaching classful addressing. There was plenty of other misinformation there. Apparently my home network is impossible to build with such few IP addresses. (I use proxy ARP to avoid creating unnecessary subnets of the already too small block I have.) Meanwhile, RIPE's training sessions rap you on the knuckles for using terms like "Class C" even though in a world of broken stacks from Cisco and Microsoft, you pretty much need to know about it anyway. -- PGP key ID E85DC776 - finger abuse () mooli org uk for full key /:.*posting.google.com.*/HX-Trace:+j
Current thread:
- DSL Network Design Question surfer () mauigateway com (Aug 13)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Peter Dambier (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Robert E . Seastrom (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Roy Badami (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question (Aug 15)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Mark Foster (Aug 15)
- Re: DSL Network Design Question Jon Lewis (Aug 14)