nanog mailing list archives

Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path

From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 08:56:27 -1000


seems to me that, if your questions are not clearly answered by the
bgp specs, then something is sorely broken.

randy

Current thread:

Order of ASes in the BGP Path Abhishek Verma (Aug 29)
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Richard A Steenbergen (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Abhishek Verma (Aug 29)
    - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Randy Bush (Aug 29)
    - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Abhishek Verma (Aug 29)
    - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 30)
    - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Jake Khuon (Aug 30)
    - Bellsouth.net Outage? Alan Spicer (Aug 30)
    - Re: Bellsouth.net Outage? Jon Lewis (Aug 30)
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Paul Jakma (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Randy Bush (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Tom Sanders (Aug 29)
    - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Paul Jakma (Aug 29)
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Steven M. Bellovin (Aug 29)
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Stephen J. Wilcox (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Abhishek Verma (Aug 30)
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path william(at)elan.net (Aug 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Robert Bonomi (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Paul Jakma (Aug 29)
  - Re: Order of ASes in the BGP Path Tom Sanders (Aug 29)