nanog mailing list archives
Re: Two Tiered Internet
From: Michael Loftis <mloftis () wgops com>
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:40:24 -0700
--On December 13, 2005 8:17:43 PM -0800 Tony Li <tony.li () tony li> wrote:
One might argue that in such a situation, the end user is getting less value than they did previously. End users might then either demand a price break or might vote with their connectivity.
*IF* they have a choice. In many areas for consumer grade access, you don't. I fully agree that you're not getting the same value/.worth out of a service that behaves like that. The strategy they're proposiing is very anti-competitive and very monopolistic.
Current thread:
- Re: Two Tiered Internet, (continued)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Per Heldal (Dec 14)
- Message not available
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Daniel Senie (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Bob Snyder (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Tony Li (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Deepak Jain (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Stephen Sprunk (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Marshall Eubanks (Dec 13)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Michael Loftis (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Per Heldal (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Marshall Eubanks (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Steve Gibbard (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet David Barak (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Per Heldal (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Michael . Dillon (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Bob Snyder (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet bmanning (Dec 14)
- Re: Two Tiered Internet Sean Donelan (Dec 14)