nanog mailing list archives
RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet]
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 11:31:43 +0700
Can we build, pay for, and sustain an Internet that never has congestion or is never "busy".
s/never/when there are not multiple serious cuts/ would we build a bank where only some of the customers can get their money back? we're selling delivery of packets at some bandwidth. we should deliver it. otherwise, it's called false advertising. randy
Current thread:
- The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Fergie (Dec 14)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Hannigan, Martin (Dec 14)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Lamar Owen (Dec 16)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Randy Bush (Dec 14)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Schliesser, Benson (Dec 15)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Hannigan, Martin (Dec 15)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Kevin (Dec 15)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Schliesser, Benson (Dec 15)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Fergie (Dec 15)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Sean Donelan (Dec 15)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] John Kristoff (Dec 15)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 15)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] John Kristoff (Dec 15)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Sean Donelan (Dec 15)