nanog mailing list archives
RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet]
From: "Fergie" <fergdawg () netzero net>
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 20:28:00 GMT
Sean, And let's see: What was the problem again? ;-) Oh, yeah -- some telco execs want to degrade traffic in their networks based on __________. (Fill in the blank.) - ferg -- Sean Donelan <sean () donelan com> wrote: On Fri, 16 Dec 2005, Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
Maybe part of the discussion problem here is the overbroad use of 'QOS in the network!' ? Perhaps saying, which I think people have, that QOS
[snip] If you want to define QoS as a strawman, you can. But it doesn't solve the problem. -- "Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson Engineering Architecture for the Internet fergdawg () netzero net or fergdawg () sbcglobal net ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/
Current thread:
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet], (continued)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Jay Hennigan (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Joe Maimon (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Mikael Abrahamsson (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Joe Maimon (Dec 18)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] tony sarendal (Dec 18)
- Message not available
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 16)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Stephen Sprunk (Dec 16)
- RE: The Qos PipeDream [Was: RE: Two Tiered Internet] Sean Donelan (Dec 16)
- Re: The Qos PipeDream Florian Weimer (Dec 16)