nanog mailing list archives
RE: Awful quiet?
From: "Hannigan, Martin" <hannigan () verisign com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 09:18:06 -0500
Peter Dambier <peter () peter-dambier de> writes:Used to have its IPv6 enabled. Gave me problems with connectivity. I dont have IPv6 to the outside so I had to disable the stack. Runs a lot smoother now. It tooks me week to get the IPv6 stack running in the first place.You've had quite the run of bad luck. My IPv6 stuff was working perfectly and with almost no effort. Until I lost an ethernet card in a VXR and snagged one from the IPv6 box as a "spare", heh. Gotta get around to fixing that, but in the meantime no IPv6 on the colo LAN is not exactly an operational deal-killer.
Once I turned on ipv6 on my Windows machine. It worked.
Current thread:
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter), (continued)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Stephen Sprunk (Dec 21)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Kevin Day (Dec 21)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Jeroen Massar (Dec 22)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Kevin Day (Dec 22)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Daniel Roesen (Dec 27)
- Re: Addressing versus Routing (Was: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter) Michael . Dillon (Dec 22)
- Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?) Todd Vierling (Dec 21)
- Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?) Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?) Kevin Day (Dec 21)
- Re: Deploying IPv6 in a datacenter (Was: Awful quiet?) Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)