nanog mailing list archives
#nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down
From: Albert Meyer <from_nanog () corenap com>
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2005 14:30:18 -0600
I'd like to see a useful #nanog where network operators could chat. I looked around at the various IRC networks and freenode looks OK. They bind channels to organizations, so #nanog could be bound to NANOG; this would allow the channel to be rescued if it got lost. Does anyone agree that this would be a good idea? Andrew Kirch wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1william(at)elan.net wrote:I think you're confusing nanog-l with #nanog
Current thread:
- http://weblog.disgu.st down Tyrone Chickenbone (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down william(at)elan.net (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Andrew Kirch (Dec 21)
- #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Albert Meyer (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down chip (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Albert Meyer (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Gadi Evron (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Daniel Roesen (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Andrew Kirch (Dec 21)
- Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down william(at)elan.net (Dec 21)
- Re: #nanog: was Re: http://weblog.disgu.st down Paul Vixie (Dec 21)