nanog mailing list archives
RE: Infected list
From: "Scott Morris" <swm () emanon com>
Date: Mon, 26 Dec 2005 21:12:34 -0500
Irregardless of that, I always thought the whole point of a DDoS attack was quantity of hosts, not relying on quality of connection. I thought we were theorizing anyway. ;) -----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Florian Weimer Sent: Monday, December 26, 2005 2:47 PM To: swm () emanon com Cc: Nanog () mandarin com; nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Infected list * Scott Morris:
Not to mention that many IP's may be set to one device, yet there are multiple things NAT'd behind it.
Are there any devices which perform non-static NAT and can forward significant DoS traffic? 8-) Perhaps if it's just a single flow, but this kind of DoS traffic would be rather unusual.
Current thread:
- Infected list Barrett G. Lyon (Dec 25)
- Re: Infected list Rob Thomas (Dec 25)
- Re: Infected list Richard Cox (Dec 26)
- Re: Infected list Rob Thomas (Dec 26)
- RE: Infected list Scott Morris (Dec 26)
- Re: Infected list Florian Weimer (Dec 26)
- RE: Infected list Scott Morris (Dec 26)
- Re: Infected list Richard Cox (Dec 26)
- Re: Infected list Rob Thomas (Dec 25)