nanog mailing list archives
Re: ChinaNet Contacts
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:39:08 -0500
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 14:09:58 EST, "Hannigan, Martin" said:
I wouldn't go as far as label it systemic. Both Chinese and Korean organizations are participating in some of the behind the scenes security/mitigation activities going on and have been helpful. Not all. Some.
Yes, however the clue is spread very thin indeed - I'm sure the clued have their hands full dealing with the *really* egregious issues, and "yet another compromised host" is too common a case for them to be able to deal with it. Those of us who have *enough* trouble keeping our own broadband users zombie-free should be glad we're not the Korean CIRT staff. *THEY* got handed an entire *COUNTRY* full of clueless users on high-speed connections.
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts, (continued)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts william(at)elan.net (Feb 17)
- Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Simon Waters (Feb 18)
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Alex Bligh (Feb 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Kornet/ChinaNet was Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 19)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Suresh Ramasubramanian (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- RE: ChinaNet Contacts Dan Hollis (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 17)
- Re: ChinaNet Contacts Gadi Evron (Feb 17)