nanog mailing list archives
Re: NANOG Changes
From: Joe Provo <nanog-post () rsuc gweep net>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 07:22:28 -0500
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 10:19:45PM +0200, Gadi Evron wrote:
Scott Weeks wrote:On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Gadi Evron wrote: : want to see at this headache of a position, or we do it openly on the Yes, publically. Please.Publically - on NANOG itself, please.
Please no. Speaking as someone for whom this place was a learning resource for many years until I was able to give back in kind, the 'governance' stuff may be important but it is not operational. Betty already said there will be governance and direction handled on nanog-futures. That's the Right Place. Joe, not a party to any of the reform stuff just someone who want to restore utilitity to the list. -- RSUC / GweepNet / Spunk / FnB / Usenix / SAGE
Current thread:
- NANOG Changes Betty Burke (Feb 16)
- Re: NANOG Changes Scott Weeks (Feb 16)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Steve Gibbard (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Scott Weeks (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Gadi Evron (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Joe Provo (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Scott Weeks (Feb 22)
- Re: NANOG Changes Steve Gibbard (Feb 17)
- Re: NANOG Changes Paul Vixie (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes William Allen Simpson (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Stephen J. Wilcox (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Simon Lyall (Feb 19)
- Re: NANOG Changes Michael . Dillon (Feb 21)
- Re: NANOG Changes Jim Popovitch (Feb 19)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: NANOG Changes Michel Py (Feb 19)
- RE: NANOG Changes Michel Py (Feb 19)