nanog mailing list archives

Re: AOL scomp


From: "Edward B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:08:07 +0000 (GMT)


All,


Thanks for the many on- and off-list replies.  Things begin to make a
bit more sense.

We recently began hosting a list with several AOL subscribers, and this
week's complaint volume is five times what it was last week.  With one
complaint per ~4 AOL subscribers (who are but 4.6% of the total list)
this time around, and _zero_ complaints from anywhere else, I thought
something was amiss.  'tis a pity AOLers can't tell "delete" from
"unsubscribe" from spam.

Time to VERPify the list and unsubscribe people mercilessly. *grumble*

On the cynical side:  Has anyone considered an "inverted" blacklist --
i.e., a _destination_-based mail blocking mechanism?  Rejecting mail to
parties with excessive bogus complaint rates certainly might simplify
life for those tasked with handling "abuse" incidents. ;-)

On a more positive note:  One AOL user unsubscribed correctly.  I don't
mean to bash all AOLers... just the ones who are a bit... confused.


Thanks to all,
Eddy
--
Everquick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
________________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses:
davidc () brics com -*- jfconmaapaq () intc net -*- sam () everquick net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
Ditto for broken OOO autoresponders and foolish AV software backscatter.


Current thread: