nanog mailing list archives
Re: Measure overall network availability
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <ops.lists () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2005 18:44:07 +0530
On Fri, 07 Jan 2005 06:41:46 -0500, Jim Popovitch <jimpop () yahoo com> wrote:
I've often wondered, as I work intimately with NMS software, just how much cross network traffic is "are you there?" related. Would it have a positive impact on overall net performance if everyone just turned off all internetwork status polling?
not too much, when done right .. and when compared to all the noise out there - martian packets, p2p downloads, worm generated traffic ... -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.lists () gmail com)
Current thread:
- Measure overall network availability Joe Shen (Jan 06)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Allan Liska (Jan 06)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 06)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Jim Popovitch (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Petri Helenius (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Suresh Ramasubramanian (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Vicky Rode (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Robert E . Seastrom (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Jim Popovitch (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Nils Ketelsen (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Stephane Bortzmeyer (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Gordon (Jan 07)
- Re: Measure overall network availability Michael Painter (Jan 07)