nanog mailing list archives
Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS
From: Rob Thomas <robt () cymru com>
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2005 15:20:12 -0600 (CST)
Hi, NANOGers. ] But as long as people get to snif your packets, you're dead in the ] water unless you use IPsec. The same is often said about SSL for web transactions. This is why keystroke loggers are so popular in bots and other malware. The point is that folks shouldn't assume that encrypted packets keep them safe. Encryption != security. Thanks, Rob. -- Rob Thomas http://www.cymru.com Shaving with Occam's razor since 1999.
Current thread:
- IPv6, IPSEC and DoS J. Oquendo (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Christopher L. Morrow (Dec 31)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 01)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Valdis . Kletnieks (Jan 02)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Rob Thomas (Jan 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS J. Oquendo (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Joe Abley (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS David Barak (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Christopher L. Morrow (Jan 03)
- Re: IPv6, IPSEC and DoS Iljitsch van Beijnum (Jan 03)